Tandoori Fish

Tandoori Fish

Ingredients:

  1. 6 small pamphlet or any other white fish
  2. 6 tablespoons lemon juice
  3. 3 teaspoons salt
  4. 2 tablespoons garlic paste
  5. 2 tablespoons ginger paste
  6. 1 teaspoon ajowan (carum)
  7. 1\4 teaspoon turmeric powder (haldi)
  8. 2 teaspoons chili powder
  9. 1 tablespoon garam masala

How to Cook:

1. Clean the fish but leave the heads and tails on. Wash the fish thoroughly the inside and outside of the fish. Slash in 3-4 places on both sides.

2. Mix lemon juice and half the salt together and rub on both sides of the fish. Leave to marinate for 30 minutes.

3. Meanwhile, prepare the marinade. In a bowl, mix well the garlic paste, ginger paste, ajowan, turmeric, chili powder, remaining salt, garam masala and 2 table spoons of lemon juice.

4. Place the fish in a flat dish, pour the marinade over it and rub it well into the cuts. Cover and leave to marinate for about 4 hours or overnight in the refrigerator.

5. Pierce each fish with a large metal skewer. Brush on both sides with some oil and barbecue over live charcoal for about 15 minutes. If barbecue is not possible, it can be grilled or baked uncovered in a oven for about 20-25 minutes.

6. Turn the fish once during cooking and keep brushing with oil to prevent burning.

 

This recipe serves 6 people.

Preparation Time: 15 minutes.

Cooking Time: 30 minutes.
 

 

Posted in Food | 1 Comment

Women in the Khilafah and challenging the perceptions of the West

Women in the Khilafah and challenging the perceptions of the West For many westerners the idea that “Islam oppresses women” is a well established fact. The rights of women in Islam, especially those living under an Islamic system, is a hotly debated topic where much misunderstanding exists.

Some of the statements made concerning Islam’s treatment of women are ludicrous, fictitious and comical in some instances.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a discredited ex-Dutch MP, who lied about an arranged marriage to secure Dutch citizenship, is one of these so-called champions of Muslim women’s rights. Her note to fame came after she wrote a screenplay for a film called Submission directed by the murdered film director Theo van Gogh.

The film’s title is a direct translation of the word “Islam” and portrays four naked Muslim women after they have been beaten and raped by male members of their families. Verses from the Holy Qur’an concerning women are then superimposed on their naked beaten bodies. Someone with even the slightest knowledge of Islam knows that accusing the Qur’an of encouraging rape, especially by family members, is a ludicrous claim to say the least.

Unfortunately, when discussing the rights of Muslim women this level of argument is all too common.

Bush’s recent speech on the Khilafah, cited examples from the Taliban to paint a picture of the Khilafah as “a land where women were imprisoned in their homes.girls could not go to school.women were publicly whipped.”

Leaving aside the rights and wrongs of the Taliban’s rule, how will the soon to be established Khilafah deal with women?

It’s important to understand that the attack on Islam’s treatment of women comes not from Muslim women themselves but from mainly from non-Muslims who have an outsiders view on the issue. This need many feel to “liberate” Muslim women from the shackles of their family prison or from the hijab are not shared by the majority of Muslim women.

In a poll conducted by The Gallup Organization, and reported in the New York Times article – Muslim Women Don’t See Themselves as Oppressed, Survey Finds – showed clearly the aspirations and concerns of Muslim women. Their main concerns were the lack of unity among Muslim nations, violent extremism, and political and economic corruption. All concerns that only the Khilafah will address.

“The hijab, or head scarf, and burqa, the garment covering face and body, seen by some Westerners as tools of oppression, were never mentioned in the women’s answers to the open-ended questions, the poll analysts said.”

The survey also found that “an overwhelming majority of the women polled in each country cited “attachment to moral and spiritual values” as the best aspect of their own societies.”

Islam is unique when it comes to treating the problems of men and women. In “man-made” systems and religions, where human beings (mostly men) decide their own values and legislative systems, women will inevitably suffer oppression and exploitation. Men don’t understand what its like to be a women so how can they possible legislate laws for them?

Islam was revealed from the creator of men and women – Allah (swt). Muslim men and women are equal in the sight of Allah (swt), differing only in their levels of obedience to Him. This ensures that women do not suffer under man-made laws that suit the interests of men only.

Islam recognises that men and women have different natures and therefore different roles to play in society.

Here are a few points regarding the position of women in the Khilafah:

EDUCATION

Seeking knowledge is obliged on men and women. It’s especially important for women to have a high level of Islamic education as they are the primary source of knowledge for their children whilst growing up.

It’s obligatory on the Khilafah to provide the best education and medical services possible to its citizens. It is therefore necessary to have an abundance of women doctors, nurses and teachers to fulfil these roles.

Article 173 of the draft constitution states:

“It is an obligation upon the State to teach every individual, male or female, those things which are necessary for the mainstream of life. This should be obligatory and provided freely in the primary and secondary levels of education. The State should, to the best of its ability, provide the opportunity for everyone to continue higher education free of charge.”

WORK

The primary role of a woman is a mother and a wife. She is not burdened with having to work to support herself. This burden falls on her male guardians – either her husband if she is married or her father or brothers. If she has no guardian then she is entitled to state benefits and not obliged to find work.

Having said this, women are allowed to work and play an important role in the society beside their role in the family. Women doctors, teachers, nurses, judges, police officers are all necessary for the society to function. Women may feel embarrassed discussing marital disputes or asking sensitive questions related to women only issues to a male judge. Women judges, especially in the family courts will be needed by the state.

Even if a Muslim women works she is under no obligation to spend money on the family. She may be rich but the burden falls on the man. The husband or family has no right to touch the finances of the women under his care. Muslim women must pay their taxes if they work such as Kharaj, ushr and zakat. Non-Muslim women citizens (dhimmi) are exempt from paying the Jizya (head tax) even if they work.

GOVERNMENT

Women are obliged to voice their political opinions and account the Khilafah government. They can be judges, heads of government departments, members of the House of Representatives (Majlis ul-Ummah) and they can vote for the Caliph. Due to restrictions imposed by their creator – Allah (swt) who knows them better than they know themselves, they cannot hold the position of Caliph or any cabinet posts. Muslim women will have no issue with this as they work hard to obey their Creator and gain His pleasure.

FAMILY LIFE

Honour killings, domestic violence and mistreatment of wives is completely prohibited by Islam. The aim of marriage is to achieve tranquillity through a partnership between husband and wife.

Prophet Muhammad (saw) said, “The one who has the most perfect Imaan (belief) amongst you is the one with the most beautiful morals and the best of you is the one who is best to his wives.” [Tirmidhi]

RULE OF LAW

Men and women are treated equally under the law. The only differences are when it comes to the number of witnesses required to convict a person. Generally, two women witnesses are equal to one male witness. This doesn’t mean that women have half the status of a man as some claim, rather this law decreed not by man but by the women’s creator – Allah (swt). Again women accept this position willingly as obedience to Allah (swt).

Much has been made of Islam’s adultery laws saying they unfairly target women. Examples are cited from Pakistan and from under the Taliban.

The adultery law applies equally to men as it does to women. For a court case of adultery to be proven, four trustworthy witnesses whose testimonies are thoroughly investigated, must testify to have seen the actual penetration. If the accuser cannot provide these four witnesses he himself will face lashing. If the accused women testifies under oath that she was raped then even with four witnesses she wouldn’t face punishment.

It should be noted that in ordinary court courses for example for theft and murder require 2 witnesses. Adultery requires 4 witnesses who MUST see actual penetration. In practice, its virtually impossible to get 4 witnesses to this crime. The evidence for all adultery court cases during the early years of the Khilafah was confession and NOT witnesses. The harsh punishment for adultury (stoning to death) is a detterant punishment showing the society the strong value of marriage. An example adultery court case is given below.

Some Muslims in Basra became critical of the conduct of Mugheera. Among them was Abu Bakra Thaqeefi whose house across the street faced the house of Mugheera. One day a strong wind blew and the windows of the houses of Abu Bakra and Mugheera got opened through the force of the wind.

Abu Bakra saw through his window that in this house Mugheera was locked up in an uncompromising state with a woman. He thought that the woman was Umm Jamil. He had some friends with him, and they also saw Mugheera involved with a woman.

Abu Bakra Saqeefi wrote to Umar accusing Mugheera of adultery. The report was endorsed by four witnesses who had seen Mugheera in an uncompromising state with a woman.

Umar took prompt action. Umar appointed Abu Musa as the Governor of Basra and removed Mugheera from the office. Mugheera was summoned to Madina to face the trial. Abu Bakra and the other witnesses who had made the complaint were also summoned to Madina.

At the trial, Mugheera pleaded not guilty. His defense was that the woman in question was his wife and not Umm Jamil. With great indignation he averred that Abu Bakra and the men with him had no right to interfere in his privacy.

Abu Bakra on the other hand maintained that the woman was Umm Jamil. Three other witnesses corroborated the statement of Abu Bakra. The fourth witness Ziyad stated that he had seen the event, but he had not seen the face of the woman and did not know who she was. The other witnesses were cross examined, and it was found that there were some weak points in their evidence. They were asked whether the woman had her back or her face toward them. They said that she had their back to them. They tried to make out that even from her back she could be identified as Umm Jamil. They argued that the scandal of Mugheera and Umm Jamil was very common in Basra, and that lady was none else but Umm Jamil.

Under the Quranic law in order to press the charge of adultery definite evidence of four witnesses was necessary. As in this case the fourth witness was not sure of the identification of the woman, Mugheera was given the benefit of doubt and acquitted. Abu Bakra and his companions who had leveled the charge were punished with lashes for making a charge which could not be established.

HIJAB

Women in the Khilafah are obliged to wear the headscarf (khimar) and the long dress (jilbab). They are not obliged to cover their faces, although if they want to follow this Islamic opinion and wear the burqa they can.

Hijab is not an issue for Muslim women as the survey cited above makes clear. The west has an obsession with the hijab and women’s clothing in general. In France, the home of Chanel and Yves Saint Laurent they became so obsessed they banned the hijab. This oppression of women, forcing them to remove their clothing and walk around in clothing more pleasing to men’s eyes, would never happen in the Khilafah. The fact that countries have to ban the hijab, shows the growing number of Muslim women that love the hijab and want to wear it. It also shows the complete failure of the western views of women that are pushed as “universal values” for humanity.

Before those in the west jump to conclusions about Muslim women start making up rules for them, they should ask Muslim women what THEY want. The Gallup Organization survey makes it clear that what Muslim women want is Islam and the unity of the Muslims, i.e. the re-establishment of the Khilafah.

Source:   KCom Journal

Posted in Disclosure, Religion of Abraham | Leave a comment

Let Our Children Live – NURIT PELED-ELHANAN

Bassam Aramin spent nine years in an Israeli prison. He belonged to Yasser Arafat’s Al Fatah in the Hebron area and attempted to throw a grenade at an Israeli army Jeep in occupied Hebron. Last Wednesday morning, an Israeli soldier in a jeep in his village of Anata, on the West Bank, shot his nine year old daughter, Abir, in the head. The soldier will not spend an hour in jail. In Israel, soldiers are not imprisoned for killing Arabs. Never. It does not matter whether the Arabs are young or old, real or potential terrorists, peaceful demonstrators or stone throwers. The army has not conducted an inquiry in Abir Aramin’s death. Neither the police nor the courts have questioned anyone. There will be no investigation. As far as the Israeli Defense Forces are concerned, the shooting did not happen. The army’s official account of her death is that she was hit by a stone that one of her classmates was throwing “at our forces.” Continue reading

Posted in Disclosure | Leave a comment

The Sunnis and the Shiites in solidarity – Who are the terrorists?

Iraq: Thousand kneel for prayer 

Operation Northwoods, Project Gladio, and Synthetic Terrorism  

By Michael Tivana, March 2006 – tribalmessenger.org

“Governments are fortunate that the people can not think” – Hitler

The conclusion that the citizens of a nation can be easily fooled was proven by the Nazis on the German people and led to World War II. The first axiom of war is to persuade the people that there is an immanent threat to their safety. Through the millennia, the way to start a war is to create a threat to the peoples’ security. Before a country is willing to wage war, the first question the people must ask and answer is, “who are the real terrorists? who is the threat?” Henry Kissinger provides insight when he spoke to the designers of our world (the Bilderbergs) in Evian France in 1991 about the future.

“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil… with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.”

In 1997, Zbigniew Brzezinski – founder of the Trilateral Commission in his book “The Grand Chessboard”

“As America becomes an increasingly multicultural society, it may become more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat.” Operation Northwoods http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/doc1.pdf

This proposal by the Joint Chiefs of Staff in 1962 was a plan to justify U.S. military intervention in Cuba. It called for: the assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities including blowing up shopping centers. Castro would be blamed . The plans were developed as means to trick the American public and the international community into supporting a war to oust Fidel Castro from power.

Project Gladio

Wikipedia, http://www.isn.ethz.ch/php/documents /collection_gladio/synopsis.htm

“You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security.”

Project Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra during the exposure of Project Gladio in Italy in 1991

This project is still ongoing and was first revealed by Italian Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti in 1991. Gladio, from the Latin “sword”, is protected and hidden to this day by its founding patrons, the CIA and the UK’s MI6. Yet parliamentary investigations in Italy, Switzerland and Belgium have exposed enough of the truth to show that terrorist attacks by a government on its own people, is possible, probable and ongoing. These attacks have been gathered in a book, “NATO’s Secret Armies: Operation Gladio and Terrorism in Western Europe,” by Daniele Ganser.

The Pentagon

In the Pentagon document, Field Manual FM 30-31B, the world can see the way the Pentagon thinks on such matters as using terrorism to gain control of the minds of the citizenry. The document details the methodology for launching terrorist attacks in nations that “do not react with sufficient effectiveness” against “communist subversion.” The manual states that the most dangerous moment comes when leftist groups “renounce the use of force” and embrace the democratic process. It is then that “U.S. army intelligence must have the means of launching special operations which will convince Host Country Governments and public opinion of the reality of the insurgent danger.”

In Iraq the Pentagon has launched a similar plan through a new militant group, “Saraya Iraqna,” a pro-occupation death squad that has began offering up to $50,000 USD for insurgent scalps, according to the Iraqi paper Al Ittihad. The group states, “Our activity will not be selective,” meaning anyone they consider an enemy of the state will be fair game. Does this include mosques and markets?

The majority of the candidates that were elected to the Iraqi national congress support a speedy end to the American occupation. But now the shift toward high-profile civilian slaughter and the labeling of the terrorist acts as a Civil War has strengthened the “urgent need” for U.S. forces to remain on the scene indefinitely to provide security.

Cui bono? Who benefits? Whose powers and policies are enhanced by these attacks? It is indisputable that the “strategy of tension” means power and profit for those who claim to possess the key to “security.” From the halls of Europe to the banks of the Potomac, this cynical strategy is the ruling ideology of our times. The citizens of the world must be made aware of synthetic, self induced terrorism, and the people must end this policy before it ends us.

Will the people of the world allow the War On Terror to spread? This war is not winnable and it will only create hell on Earth. If the US or Israel attacks Syria and Iran it is entirely possible for oil to surge to $150 a barrel and the world will erupt into chaos. The creed for the designers of our world is “Order From Chaos”. They create the chaos and give us their New World Order, run by their World Government, controlled by their new global currency.

“That we are to stand by the president right or wrong is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to America.” – President Theodore Roosevelt Iran, Countdown to Synthetic War

From 1954 to 2006, the US and other nations have supplied Iran with the weapons to wage war.

From 1954 to 2006, the US and other nations have supplied Iran with the weapons to wage war.

· Sept. 23, 2002 “British officials have approved the export of key components needed to make nuclear weapons to Iran,” – `The BBC News’, “UK sells bomb material to Iran”

· 2005 – Belgium sells sensitive equipment which could enhance Iran’s ability to develop nuclear weapons.

· Oct. 15, 2005 – “Former members of the Russian military have been secretly helping Iran obtain technology to make missiles capable of hitting European capitals,” – `The Telegraph” in the UK

· Dec. 27, 2005 – “Several Chinese companies involved in selling missile goods and chemical-arms materials to Iran have been hit with U.S. sanctions”

– `The Washington Times’

· Jan. 8, 2006 “Britain allows export of radioactive material, rare zirconium and hafnium, both used in making nuclear power and nuclear bombs, to Iran”

– `The Australian News’

After supplying Iran with the technology to create advanced weapons, these same nations are accusing Iran of wanting to create weapons. This is lunacy, not reason for war.

Summer 1980, Bush Sr. negotiates with Iranians to hold American hostages until after election in exchange for weapons of war Ahmadinejad was the head of the hostage takers and was the chief advisor to Ayatolluh Khomeni on the hostages

· March 1987, “A few months ago I told the American people I did not trade arms for hostages. My heart and my best intentions still tell me that is true, but the facts and the evidence tell me it is not.” – Pres. Reagan

· April, 2003 – US attacks Iraq, Iran and Syria sign a defense treaty, attack one you attack both

· 2005 – Ahmadinejad becomes president of Iran and is identified as the head of the hostage takers by 6 of the hostages he held. He begins bad mouthing the West while starting a Uranium enrichment program

· Bush warns: “I want to remind you that the current president of Iran has announced that the destruction of Israel is an important part of their agenda, and that’s unacceptable.

· “there is no other choice but to refer the matter to the Security Council” – Rice

· “Iran is at the very least developing options for a nuclear weapons program” – Jack Straw, Britain

· Dec. 27, 2005 – “Iran already has nuclear weapons and Turkey should be ready for a possible US air operation against Iran and Syria.” – Porter Goss, head of the CIA on tour in Turkey

· “Washington should be prepared to take military action if necessary against Iran.” Sen. McCain

· Jan. 2006 – 27% of Americans consider Iran the “greatest danger” to the US, and 47% said they favor military action to halt Iran’s nuclear program according to a Pew Poll

· March 20, 2006 – Iran launches the PetroEuro stock exchange to trade its oil, 5 10% of world oil supply. How much will this weaken the dollar?

· March, 2006 – US steps up sanctions on Syria while calling for sanctions against Iran

This information is posted on the Internet at

p. 1 – http://www.tribalmessenger.org/headlines/3-22-06-iran -gladio-terrorists.htm

p.2 – http://www.tribalmessenger.org/headlines/3-11-06-iran-un -bilderbergs.htm

Posted in Conspiracy, Disclosure | Leave a comment

Is the Caliphate a dream?

Muslims worldwide aspire for unity and the return of the Islamic Caliphate. As recent surveys show the majority of Muslims in some of the major Muslim countries want a Caliphate.

But does a 21st century Caliphate have any chance of being established or are Muslims just dreaming?

You can read what the ‘experts’ say here and what a ‘leading journalist’ says here. I have summarised the main points below. Continue reading

Posted in Disclosure, Religion of Abraham | Leave a comment

The Restrictions Remain – Life Under Prohibition in Palestine By AMIRA HASS

 

All the promises to relax restrictions in the West Bank have obscured the true picture. A few roadblocks have been removed, but the following prohibitions have remained in place. (This information was gathered by Haaretz, the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs and Machsom Watch)

Standing prohibitions

  • Palestinians from the Gaza Strip are forbidden to stay in the West Bank.
  • Palestinians are forbidden to enter East Jerusalem. Continue reading
Posted in Disclosure | Leave a comment

Scanned Pakistan 1930s-1980 by Aftab Datta

[bubbleshare 197656]

Posted in Multimedia, Pakistan | Leave a comment

Presidential Candidate Fears “Gulf Of Tonkin” To Provoke Iran War

Developments converge to signify inevitable conflict despite ongoing chaos in Iraq

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Monday, January 15, 2007

Republican Congressman and 2008 Presidential candidate Ron Paul fears a staged Gulf of Tonkin style incident may be used to provoke air strikes on Iran as numerous factors collide to heighten expectations that America may soon be embroiled in its third war in six years.

Writing in his syndicated weekly column, the representative of Texas’ 14th district warns of “a contrived Gulf of Tonkin-type incident (that) may occur to gain popular support for an attack on Iran.”

The August 1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident, where US warships were apparently attacked by North Vietnamese PT Boats, was cited by President Johnson as a legitimate provocation mandating U.S. escalation in Vietnam, yet Tonkin was a staged charade that never took place. Declassified LBJ presidential tapes discuss how to spin the non-event to escalate it as justification for air strikes and the NSA faked intelligence data to make it appear as if two US ships had been lost. Continue reading

Posted in Conspiracy, Disclosure, Iran | Leave a comment

Imperial History of The Middle East

Who has controlled the Middle East over the course of history? Pretty much everyone. Egyptians, Turks, Jews, Romans, Arabs, Persians, Europeans…the list goes on.

Watch 5000 years of history in 90 seconds. 

More Maps

Posted in Disclosure, History | Leave a comment

Russia sees Muslim population boom – Al Jazeera

By Jonah Hull

The Muslim population could outnumber ethnic Russians within 30 years. Low domestic birth rates and rising immigration from the former Soviet republics have produced an explosive growth in Russia’s Muslim community.

At the same time Russia’s overall population is in crisis. Short life spans and low birth rates among ethnic Russians mean the population is declining by 700,000 people a year.

The return of long-denied religious freedoms in Russia has seen Islam flourish. As a result, many ethnic Russians fear their country is losing its national identity.

There are around 25 million Muslims in Russia today, a rise of 40 per cent since 1989.

By 2020, with the continued growth rate, Muslims will account for one-fifth of the entire population.

Immigration

Their numbers continue to grow, fed by immigration from largely Muslim, former Soviet republics in the North Caucasus and Central Asia.

Islamic leaders have said that Russia is a haven for Muslim immigrants, keen to work and build on their growing community, and they discount the rise of hostile nationalist sentiment.

Damir Gizatullin, from the Council of Muftis, said: “Some irresponsible politicians want to achieve electoral success by creating nationalist waves. 

“When they say Russia is for Russians, it’s a mistaken path that could lead to the break-up of the Russian Federation.”

Many ethnic Russians are terrified at the prospect of becoming a minority in their own country.

Alexander Belov, from the Movement Against Illegal Immigration, said: “History is a fight between races and religions.

“It’s the law of nature … people are used to being with people like themselves, speaking the language their mothers taught them.”

The Orthodox Church, restored since the Soviet collapse, remains dominant in Russia.

But with the rise of Islam, coupled with the negative growth in Russia’s ethnic Slav population, dramatic change is under way.

If the trend continues, the Muslim population could outnumber ethnic Russians within 30 years.

Source: Al Jazeera.

Posted in Disclosure, Religion of Abraham | Leave a comment