Dahiyeh, South Beirut.
Like many liberation and resistant movement â€˜Manifestosâ€™ â€˜Chartersâ€™ or â€˜Declarationsâ€™ issued to the public early in its founding — the African National Congress, Palestine Liberation Organization , Hamas, Algerian FLN, and various â€œSons of Libertyâ€ groups during the American Revolution, come to mind â€” Hezbollah has been criticized by its detractors over the years for some language in its 1985 â€œOpen Letterâ€ manifesto. Some have urged Hezbollah to remove â€œcontroversial languageâ€ such as the call for an Islamic Republic in Lebanon- even though the Party has made clear that establishing an Islamic Republic of Lebanon is no longer a priority and emphasizes that Lebanonâ€™s diversity is respected, valued and permanent. Others have called Hezbollahâ€™s 1985 manifesto â€˜too religiousâ€ and too dogmatic for a broad international appeal political document.
Ideas for Hezbollahâ€™s original 1985 Manifesto evolved over 30 months following the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon, during which time the new resistance movement worked to establish itself in the turbulent period of military invasions, occupations and numerous internal and external conspiracies against it. Many secret discussions were held concerning all manner of subjects including what the new organization would be called. Many favored the name â€œThe Islamic Movement of Lebanonâ€ but before the matter came up for a vote, another of the more than 20 new local resistance groups preempted that name. Others thought the name â€œNation (Umma) of Hezbollahâ€ was more inclusive. Under time pressure to agree on a name before the â€œOpen Letterâ€ was to be issued, the name â€œHezbollahâ€, (â€œParty of Godâ€) found in the Quran was agreed upon.
The Open Letter, addressed to â€œ The Downtrodden in Lebanon and in the World’ was published on February 16, 1985, a date purposely chosen because it was the first anniversary of the Israeli assassination, of the pre-Hezbollah resistance organizer Sheik Ragheb Harb, from the south Lebanon village of Jibsheet.
Hezbollahâ€™s first Manifesto was first read at the al-Ouzai Mosque, down the hill and near the Mediterranean seashore, from the Shatila Palestinian refugee camp, by one of the founders of Hezbollah, the official spokesman for the nascent group, Sayeed Ibrahim Amin al-Sayyed, who has served for 28 years on its Shura Council and today heads Hezbollahâ€™s political council. Perhaps by coincidence, on the same day that Hezbollahâ€™s public manifesto was issued, Israel began a 10 week withdrawal from 168 towns and villages, comprising 55 percent of South Lebanon.
With respect to Shatila Camp and neighboring Burj al Barajneh camp â€” and later Rashidiyye Camp down south in Tyre — it was several weeks following Hezbollah â€˜going publicâ€™ that the â€œWar of the Campsâ€ (May 1985-July 1988) would cause more death and destruction to Palestinians than the Sabra-Shatila Massacre. Despite pressure from their fellow Shia- the Amal militia- to join them in attacking the Camps to settle plenty of still festering pre-1982 scores from PLO abuses and crimes against the southern Shia, as well as to help Syria eliminate pro-Arafat partisans and gain sole control of the â€œPalestinian Cardâ€, the newly organized Hezbollah insisted that its only enemies were the Israeli occupiers, which it was busy attacking. At the same time it repeatedly admonished Amal and Syria to end their assaults on Palestinian refugee camps. Eventually Syria, under Soviet and Arab pressure, called a halt to the criminal attacks, but to this day few Palestinians have forgiven it for this slaughter which killed more than 4,000 and wounded close to 7,000. Like Amal, Syria does not like to discuss this dark chapter and some of its officials express regret and shame.
With its â€œOpen Letterâ€ declaration Hezbollah entered a new phase, shifting the Party from secret resistance activity free from political or media interactions into public political work.
As noted above, from the day the manifesto was promulgated, some have been advising the Party to amend and â€˜tone downâ€™ the 1985 language which reflects a different period of Lebanese history and international conflict. Others aver that we are still in the same period, only more deeply. The original Hezbollah manifesto document reflects various views of the founders as well as the political thinking of senior Shia cleric Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah. Some in Dahiyeh still call Fadlallah â€œthe father of Hezbollahâ€, not for his active Party involvement which has never existed, so Hezbollah sources attest (not withstanding his name on the US terrorism list), but for his public speeches and sermons that inspired a generation of Resistance fighters in Lebanon and the region and continue to do so.
Some critics have used the Introduction to Hezbollahâ€™s 1985 â€œOpen Letterâ€ to smear the Party as religious fanatics and appearing too â€˜foreignâ€™ and too Iranian.
â€œWe are often asked: Who are we, the Hezbollah, and what is our identity?
â€œWe are the sons of the umma (Muslim community) – the party of God (Hizb Allah) the vanguard of which was made victorious by God in Iran. There the vanguard succeeded to lay down the bases of a Muslim state which plays a central role in the world. We obey the orders of one leader, wise and just, that of our tutor and faqih (jurist) who fulfills all the necessary conditions: Ruhollah Musawi Khomeini. God save him!
â€œBy virtue of the above, we do not constitute an organized and closed party in Lebanon. nor are we a tight political cadre. We are an umma linked to the Muslims of the whole world by the solid doctrinal and religious connection of Islam, whose message God wanted to be fulfilled by the Seal of the Prophets, i.e., Muhammad. This is why whatever touches or strikes the Muslims in Afghanistan, Iraq, the Philippines and elsewhere reverberates throughout the whole Muslim umma of which we are an integral part. Our behavior is dictated to us by legal principles laid down by the light of an overall political conception defined by the leading jurist (wilayat al-faqih).
â€œAs for our culture, it is based on the Holy Koran, the Sunna and the legal rulings of the faqih who is our source of imitation (marja’ al-taqlid). Our culture is crystal clear. It is not complicated and is accessible to all.â€
Some Party officials, as well as supporters, felt Hezbollah needed to issue a new document that would provide a clearer and wider vision on the resistance and its current political work and future social and ideological plan.
Against this backdrop, Hezbollahâ€™s 7th Party Conference drafted a more contemporary 32-page Manifesto reflecting 28 years of political maturity. Not to recant its 25 year old â€œOpen Letterâ€ but rather to define issues not addressed in the partyâ€™s first manifesto and to set its future political path for â€œhomeland of our fathers, ancestors, grandchildren, and the coming generations.â€
The detailed document, in four parts, provides many specifics on how Hezbollah plans to work with the new Unity Government to improve Lebanon and the lives of its entire population.
Misleading main stream media reports
For many who rely on reports offered by US and European â€˜news outletsâ€™ a dramatically skewed view was presented the morning after Tuesdayâ€™s release of Hezbollahâ€™s new political program at a large news conference in al Jinen Hall in Dahiyeh.
CNNâ€™s report on yesterdayâ€™s event was typical:
Beirut, Lebanon (CNN) â€“ Hezbollah’s chief on Monday announced the group’s new “manifesto,” which calls on all countries to “liberate Jerusalem” and declares the United States a threat to the world.
â€œAmerican terrorism is the source of every terrorism in the world,” Hassan Nasrallah said in a televised speech from an undisclosed location. Hezbollah, a political party in Lebanon, is listed as a terrorist organization by the United States and Israel.
Nasrallah does not appear in public amid concerns for his safety. “We invite and call on all Arabs and Muslims and all countries keen on peace and stability in the world to intensify efforts and resources to liberate Jerusalem from Zionist occupation and to maintain its true identity and its Islamic and Christian sanctities,” Nasrallah said.
Hezbollah has claimed responsibility for numerous terrorist attacks. It has been linked to attacks against American, Israeli and other Western targetsâ€¦.He praised Iran and Syria, which are Hezbollah’s chief backersâ€.
Only then is the reader advised that Hassan Nasrallah â€œalso touched on domestic issues.â€ In fact Hassan Nasrallah spoke for 80 minutes about domestic issues, the subject of and reason for the new Hezbollah manifesto.
Hezbollahâ€™s new political program calls for â€œThe elimination of political sectarianism as the main pre-condition to establish a true democracy as the Taif Accord stipulated and the formation of a national council for this end.â€
The Hezbollah manifesto blames sectarianism â€œfor being a strong obstacle to achieving a true democracy, whereby the elected majority can rule and the opposition can exercise its role.â€
Despite Hezbollahâ€™s desire for a sectarian-free democracy, Nasrallah said that until achieving it, his party accepts â€œconsensus democracyâ€ pursuant to the Constitution and National Pact. â€œConsensus democracy is a suitable political formula that ensures the participation of all parties,â€ he said.
Focusing extensively on the domestic level, Hezbollah, acting as a fully fledged political party, urged the implementation of administrative decentralization in order to promote balanced developmental projects over all Lebanese territories. It warned against the evolution of decentralization into any form of federalism, as he expressed the partyâ€™s opposition to any form of division, or masked federalism.
“We want a government that works for its citizens and provides the appropriate services in their education and medical care and housing to secure a decent life and to address the problem of poverty and provide employment opportunities,â€ the document reads. “We want a government that works to strengthen the role of women in society and enhance their participation in all fields.â€
Nasrallah outlined his partyâ€™s vision for the Lebanese state, saying it must â€œguarantee public liberties, ensure national unity and protect its sovereignty and independence with a strong and capable army.â€ He stressed the importance of â€œmodernâ€ institutions, an economy built on agriculture and industry and a strong judiciary.
Hezbollahâ€™s new manifesto also calls for a modern electoral law with â€œaccurate electoral representationâ€ and added that the state needs to cater to its citizensâ€™ needs, empower the youth and women and prioritize education.
The new document maps out the partyâ€™s policy on a national defense strategy, saying that Lebanon needs to confront Israeli threats with a popular resistance supported by the people and a national army that ensures the countryâ€™s stability and security. “In the absence of strategic balance, the Israeli threat obliges Lebanon to endorse a defensive strategy that depends on a popular resistance participating in defending the country and an army that preserves the security of the country — in an integrated manner,” added Hezbollahâ€™s Secretary-General. â€œAdopting the choice of the Resistance allowed Lebanon to achieve real independence and safeguard its sovereignty,â€ he added.
Hezbollahâ€™s new political manifesto emphatically declares that the Palestinians have the right to resist through all forms, primarily armed struggle. It pledges Hezbollahâ€™s work with all the Lebanese parties to grant Palestinian refugees in Lebanon â€œtheir civil and social rights,â€ while rejecting naturalization. It also calls for â€œdirect Lebanese-Palestinian dialogue.â€ Nasrallah cited the 2000 Israeli withdrawal from the South, their 2005 withdrawal from Gaza, the 2006 July War, the first and second Intifadas as well as the Hamas takeover of Gaza, and the 2009 Gaza War as victories against Israel.
â€œWe assure our constant and continuous support of the Palestinian people and cause against Israel,â€ he added.
Hezbollahâ€™s new manifesto also calls on â€œArab leaders to review their agreements with Israel and give up the idea of compromising with it, especially those who gambled on US administration policies.â€ Nasrallah added that â€œIsrael has proved that is does not seek peace and uses negotiations to impose its conditions and to achieve its gains.â€ Hezbollah hopes the Arab and Islamic countries would â€œunite and commit to the liberation of the land and reject the alternatives of naturalization of Palestinians.â€
“We call on the Arabs to set plans to liberate Palestinians in Israeli prisons,â€ Nasrallah added.
In its new political declaration, Hezbollah discusses Lebanonâ€™s foreign relations, and calls for the country to â€œmaintain its special relations with Syria because it is a political, security and economic need dictated by the two countriesâ€™ interests.â€ It declares that any â€œnegative atmosphereâ€ clouding these relations must be removedâ€.
According to Hezbollah, Lebanonâ€™s relations with Syria are part of the countryâ€™s overall relations with the Arab world and its confrontation with Israel. â€œLebanon is Arab in nature and belongingâ€ and added that its interests â€œnecessitate a commitment to just Arab causes.â€ He called some Arab countriesâ€™ disputes with Iran as a â€œstab to the back of Arab causes that only serves Israel and the US.â€
Hezbollahâ€™s new manifesto also stresses the importance of cooperation between Islamic countries and described Iran as an â€œimportant, central state in the Islamic worldâ€¦ which supports resistance movements in our area and supports Arab and Islamic causes.â€ He added that the â€œfabrications of contradictionsâ€ between Iran and Arab countries is a â€œstab in the back to the Arab cause, which serves only Israel and the US.â€
As Hezbollah initiates its future work within the Lebanese polity, initial Lebanese and international reactions appear positive according to Hezbollahâ€™s media office. The party now plans to enlist support for its new manifesto.
Wednesdayâ€™s Daily Star reported in an exclusive interview with David Miliband, the UKâ€™s Foreign Minister, that his country intends to increase contacts and dialogue with Hezbollahâ€™s politicians with European Union members considering the same. Meanwhile, Naharnet.com news bulletin reported that the U.S. Embassy â€œhas denied media reports that U.S .Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs, Jeffrey Feltman will visit Beirut this week.â€
According to the same report, â€œThe embassy also denied an al-Markaziya news agency’s report that the Obama administration would most probably replace Michele Sison as U.S. ambassador to Beirutâ€.
Franklin Lamb is doing research in Lebanon and can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org
- Endless Propaganda – The War on Terror is a Hoax By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS
- Hezbollah Militants Chafe as Gaza Burns – A Second Front? By FRANKLIN LAMB
- Living on Borrowed Time in a Stolen Land By Gilad Atzmon
- How Empires Fall – PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS
- Hezbollah Eases Up and Beirut Opens Its Shutters – FRANKLIN LAMB
- Part Three: What’s in it for Hezbollah? – Will U. S. Policy in Lebanon and the Middle East Ever Change? – FRANKLIN LAMB
- Part Two: The Israeli Project Has Failed in Lebanon – Why the Bush Administration Wants to Negotiate Now with Hezbollah – FRANKLIN LAMB
- Part One: Historical Context and Current Posturing – Bush to Nasrallah: an Offer Hezbollah Cannot Refuse? By FRANKLIN LAMB
- Blindsided, Hezbollah Mulls Its Response – FRANKLIN LAMB
- Beirut hit by deadly street battles
- Israel ‘planning another Lebanon war’
- Religion and Foreign Policy By CONN HALLINAN
- Shifting Targets – The Administrationâ€™s plan for Iran by Seymour M. Hersh
- At least 1,700 Palestinians were slaughtered on Israel’s say-so, 25 years ago this week
- Lebanon and the Planned US Airbase at Kleiaat By FRANKLIN LAMB
- Who’s Behind the Fighting in North Lebanon?
- The second coming of Saladin By Pepe Escobar
- Is the American Empire on the Brink of Collapse? By Mark Karlin
- Another Civil War in Lebanon? – Will Hezbollah Hand Israel Its 6th Defeat? – Franklin Lamb
- Israel’s Provocations:The Method in the Madness – Uri Avnery
- Gen. Aoun and the “Free Patriotic Movement” – Why Hezbollah’s Al-Manar TV is Broadcasting Sunday Mass – Sophie McNeill
- A country lost in its own region – Anthony Lowenstein – The Age – 10 Nov.06
- HOW HEZBOLLAH DEFEATED ISRAEL – PART 3: The political war
- HOW HEZBOLLAH DEFEATED ISRAEL – PART 2- Winning the ground war
- HOW HEZBOLLAH DEFEATED ISRAEL – PART 1: Winning the intelligence war
- Why Bush Will Nuke Iran – Paul Craig Roberts
- Hezbollah 2, Israel 0 — Joanna Francis
- The two Israeli troops were captured in Lebanon
- A farewell to Beirut – Robert Fisk – 22 Jul.06
- Scenes from the Lebanese Front