Azadeh, a graduate law student from Tehran University, on the sidelines of Iranâ€™s Third AnnualÂ HollywoodÂ is reminded her interlocutors, of the obvious damming admissions last week by two US politicians:
â€œIt would be a defense lawyerâ€™s worst nightmare wouldnâ€™t it? I mean to have oneâ€™s clients, in this case the Vice-President of the United States and the outgoing Secretary of state confess so publicly to serial international crimes against a civilian population?â€ The confessions and the crimes, she correctly enumerated to her audience, were those admitted to by US Vice-President Joe Biden and outgoing Secretary of State Hillary Clinton this past week.
Both of the US officials, in discussing US relations with the Islamic Republic, openly admitted that the US-led sanctions against Iran (and Syria) are politically motivated and constitute a â€œsoft-warâ€ against the nearly 80 million people of Iran (23 million people in Syria) in order to achieve regime change.
Mrs. Clinton, was the first of the dynamic duo to be heard from. She acknowledged that the harsh US sanctions were intended to target and send the people of Iran a message. â€œSo we hope that the Iranian people will make known their concernsâ€¦ so my message to Iranians is do something about this.â€
Some listening concluded she meant food riots and inflation riots to overthrow the Iranian government. An Australian Broadcasting Company interviewer asked Clinton on January 31 of last year: â€œIf you have issues with the government of Iran, why destroy the Iranian people with the current sanctions in place? Itâ€™s very difficult to find certain medicines in Iran. Where is your sense of humanity?â€
What the Clinton interrogator had in mind, she explained later, were the US-led sanctions reducing Iranâ€™s GDP growth (-1.1% GDP) resulting in an inflation of 21.0% that is being felt mostly by the civilian population. As well as periodic food shortages in the supermarkets of such staples such as rice, there are price rises on everything. For example, per page printing for students is up as much as 400% and the cost of a used car up 300%. In general, supermarket items have risen 100 to 300 percent or higher over the past twenty-four months and, devastating for many, certain lifesaving medicines are no longer available.
Clinton: â€œWell, first, let me say on the medicine and on food and other necessities, there are no sanctions.â€ This statement is utter nonsense and Mrs. Clinton knows it.
The targeting process by the US Treasury Department is well entrenched in Washington. When dear reader is next in Washington, DC, perhaps on a tour bus riding down NW Pennsylvania Avenue following a visit to the US Capitol, consider getting off the bus at 15th and Pennsylvania at the US Department of the Treasury. Walk around the main building and you will see an Annex building. This building, as Clinton knows well, and like Biden, has visited more than once, houses the Office of Financial Assets Control (OFAC). The well-funded agencyâ€™s work includes precisely targeting â€œfood and medicines and other necessitiesâ€ in order to force the civilian population of Iran to achieve regime change.
For more than two hundred years, since the War of 1812, when OFAC was founded to sanction the British, the office has become expert at imposing sanctions and it has done so more than 2000 times. OFAC currently uses a large team of specialists and computers to think-up, design, test, and send to AIPAC and certain pro-Zionist officials and members of congress their work-product topped off by recommendations.
OFAC and its Treasury Department associates have had a hand in virtually every US sanction applied to Iran since President Jimmy Carter issued Executive Order 12170 in November 1979 freezing about $12 billion in Iranian assets, including bank deposits, gold and other properties. From the State Sponsor of Terrorism Designation Act in 1979 to the Syria Accountability Act of 2004, more than a dozen Presidential Executive Orders including the 2011-2012= Executive orders which froze the US property of high-rankling Syrian and Iranian officials and more broadly E.O. 13582 which froze all governmental assets of the Syrian government and prohibited Americans from doing business with the Syrian government and banned all US import of Syrian petroleum products.
What OFAC does with its data base is science not art. It can calculate quite precisely the economic effect on the civilian population of a single action designating one company, bank, government entity or infrastructure system of a country. OFAC, on behalf of its government, electronically wages a cold war against its civilian targets.
This week OFAC Â and the Treasury Department blacklisted Iranâ€™s state broadcasting authority, Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting, responsible for] broadcast policy in Iran and overseas production at Iranian television and radio channels, Â potentially limiting viewing and listening opportunities for Iranâ€™s civilian population. Its director, Ezzatollah Zarghami, was included in the action. Additionally sanctioned are Iranâ€™s Internet-policing agencies and a major electronics producer. David S. Cohen, the pro-Zionist Treasury undersecretary for terrorism and financial intelligence, who oversees theÂ OFAC sanctions effort, reportedly following meetings with Israeli officials, said last weekâ€™s actions were meant to â€œtighten the screws and intensify the economic pressure against the Iranian regime.â€
In reality, the sanctions target the civilian population and the â€œIranian regimeâ€ wonâ€™t be much affected. The same applies to Syria. Despite thepublic relations language that â€œfood and medicine are exempted form the brutal US-led sancitons, as OFAC well knows, the reality is something else.
They know well the chilling effects of the sanctions on international suppliers of medicines and food stuffs with respect to a targeted country. The US Treasury department has thousands of gigabytes of data confirming that the boards of directors of international business do not, and will not allow their companies to risk millions of dollars in profits by technically violating any of the thousands of details in the sanctions â€” many of which are subject to interpretation â€” for the sake of doing business with Iran or Syria. This is why there are severe shortages of medicines and certain foodstuffs in these sanctioned countries and to state otherwise is Orwellian News-Speak.
OFAC does not operate in a vacuum. It works closely with other US agencies including the 16 intelligence agencies that together make up the UN Intelligence Community. Together they have applied sanctions of great breadth and severity against the civilian populations of Syria and Iran.
These sanctions have been bolstered on occasion by several direct and/or green-lighted Israeli assassinations and cyber-assaults, hoping to foment civil unrest to achieve regime change and other political goals.
A few days after Mrs. Clintonâ€™s somewhat inadvertent confession that the US government intentionally targets the civilian population of Iran, Vice President Joe Biden chimed in on the 4th of February that the US was ready to hold direct negotiations with Iran but added the caveat, â€œWe have alsoÂ made clear that Iranâ€™s leaders need not sentence their people to economic deprivation,â€ acknowledging as did Hillary that the US sanctions are intended to target and harm the Iranian and Syrian people. A senior Obama administration official described the latest step as â€œa significant turning of the screw,â€ meaning that the people of Iran face a â€œstark choiceâ€ between bowing to US demands and reviving their oil revenue, the countryâ€™s economic lifeblood or more and more sanctions will follow until they do.
This targeting of Iranâ€™s and Syriaâ€™s civilian population by US-led sanctions is a massive violation of the principles, standards and rules of international law and their most fundamental underpinnings which is the protection of civilians.
The 1977 Additional Protocols to the 1949 Geneva Conventions prohibit any measure that has the effect of depriving a civilian population of objects indispensable to its survival. Article 70 of Protocol I mandates relief operations to aid a civilian population that is â€œnot adequately providedâ€ with supplies and Article 18 of Protocol II requires relief operations for a civilian population that suffers â€œundue hardship owing to a lack of supplies essential for its survival, such as foodstuffs and medical supplies.â€
Prohibition on Starvation as a Method of Warfare
â€¢ Under international humanitarian law, civilians enjoy a right to humanitarian assistance during armed conflicts.
â€¢ Art. 23 of the Fourth Geneva Convention obligates states to facilitate the free passage and distribution of relief goods including medicines, foodstuffs, clothing and tonics intended for children under 15, expectant mothers, and maternity cases.
â€¢ Art. 70 of Additional Protocol I prohibits interfering with delivery of relief goods to all members of the civilian population.
â€¢ US-led sanctions are prohibited by the principle of proportionality found in Arts. 51 and 57 of Additional Protocol I.
â€¢ Under the terms of Art. 3 common to the 1949 Geneva Conventions, humanitarian and relief actions must be taken. Pursuant to Art. 18(2) of Additional Protocol II, relief societies must be allowed to offer their services to provide humanitarian relief
â€¢ The US-led sanctions violate the Rule of Distinction between civilians andcombatants
The Right to life
The US-led sanctions violate the right to life incorporated in numerous international human rights instruments including Art. 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966; Art. 2 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, 1950; and Art. 4 of the African Charter of Human Rights, 1981.
The Rights of the Child
One of the groups most vulnerable to US-led sanctions in Syria and Iran arechildren. The rights of children are laid down in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989, which currently stands as the most widely ratified international agreement. Most relevant in the context of the US-led sanctions are Arts. 6 and 24 of the Convention, according to which every child has the inherent right to life and the right to the highest attainable standard of health and access to medical services.
If â€œterrorismâ€ means, as the United States government defines it as the targeting of civilians in order to induce political change from their government, what is it called when the American government itself applies intense economic suffering on a civilian population, causing malnutrition, illnesses, starvation and death in order to induce regime change?
The US-led sanctions against Iran and Syria are illegal, inhumane, ineffective, immoral and outrageous. They must be resisted every day by every person of good will, everywhere, until they are withdrawn.
Franklin LambÂ is doing research in Syria and is reachable c/oÂ firstname.lastname@example.org
- Racism in Lebanon – Franklin Lamb
- A Growing Revulsion – Is the American Public About to Toss Israel? – Franklin Lamb
- What the News Stories Left Out – Hezbollah’s New Manifesto By FRANKLIN LAMB
- Hezbollah Militants Chafe as Gaza Burns – A Second Front? By FRANKLIN LAMB
- Accomplice in Cairo – Mr. Mubarak, Tear Down That Wall! By FRANKLIN LAMB
- Hezbollah Eases Up and Beirut Opens Its Shutters – FRANKLIN LAMB
- Part Three: What’s in it for Hezbollah? – Will U. S. Policy in Lebanon and the Middle East Ever Change? – FRANKLIN LAMB
- Part Two: The Israeli Project Has Failed in Lebanon – Why the Bush Administration Wants to Negotiate Now with Hezbollah – FRANKLIN LAMB
- Part One: Historical Context and Current Posturing – Bush to Nasrallah: an Offer Hezbollah Cannot Refuse? By FRANKLIN LAMB
- Blindsided, Hezbollah Mulls Its Response – FRANKLIN LAMB
- Lebanon and the Planned US Airbase at Kleiaat By FRANKLIN LAMB
- Another Civil War in Lebanon? – Will Hezbollah Hand Israel Its 6th Defeat? – Franklin Lamb